The Guidebook....



Action is what a character wants.
Letís say that we have a character named Joe. Joe wants a glass of water. Wanting that glass of water is his action. Different people will use other words. They may say itís his objective, or his goal, or his need. I use action, but what matters is the concept not the word. (I once had a student who for some reason absolutely hated using the word “action.” It just really bugged him, made him freeze up and feel uncreative. So he and I only talked about his charactersí “goals” and that was fine with both of us.)
Joe may do something about the want – the desire – that he is experiencing, or he may not. He may ask for a glass of water, he may demand it, he may beg for it. He may stick out his tongue and pant, and


hope that someone gets the message. He may simply stand up, walk to the sink, and pour himself a glass. He may do a lot of things that indicate he wants a glass of water.
Or he may do nothing. He may just sit there.
In terms of whether he possesses an action, it doesnít matter whether he acts on it. In either case, he still has an action. He has an action because he wants something: the glass of water.
Action is what the character wants.
Whether a character chooses to do something about attaining his action is a second, distinguishable step. A crucial step in the development of a drama, to be sure. Without it, thereís no play — but itís the second step, not the first.
A man who buys a lottery ticket, and


then goes home wanting to win, is not pursuing a dramatic action. The character must want something that we can watch him pursue.
When Joe speaks up and says “I want a glass of water,” his action becomes clear. It also becomes clear if someone passes by him with a tray of drinks and he desperately grabs one of the glasses, drinking it down in a gulp. We learn that a character has an action by his behavior — either through what he says or what he does.



What does it mean to have something “at stake”? Why are “high stakes” good and “low stakes” bad?
What are “stakes”?
First, letís dispel the mystery and the obfuscation. High stakes are not high emotions. High stakes are not created by injecting false “drama” into a situation by, for example, making the characterís life more miserable than Job. Conversely, stakes are not low merely because the character speaks quietly and sits still.
Instead, letís be precise. Stakes are what the character has to gain or to lose.
Thinking about stakes is a way of thinking about conflict. In a high stakes situation, the character thinks, “If I donít overcome this obstacle, Iíll die. If I do overcome it, I live, and I marry the woman I love, and Iíll have


pots of money besides.”
In low stakes, he thinks, “If I donít overcome this obstacle, life goes on and Iím only out fifty cents. If by chance I do overcome it, what I get is a peck on the cheek from a woman I never liked much in the first place.”
You could also think of stakes as a function of action. “If I donít pursue this action, Iíll die...etc.” If that works better for you, fine. Putting it in terms of conflict works best for me.
In either case, remember this: High stakes – much to gain or lose, low stakes – little to gain or lose.



In my college course recently a student, Kate, was trying to finish a one-act play based on Jack Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg. The play was a fictionalized account of an encounter between the two men in the early 1960s, when Ginsbergís star was continuing to rise but Kerouacís had fallen sharply. At this moment, Allen has come to visit Jack in the Long Island home of Jackís mother, where Jack has been living and drinking himself into oblivion.
So far, it was a very affecting piece, with Allen playing a very strong action to get Jack out of this house, away from his mother, and back to some semblance of the life they once led. Jack was in the reactive role, resisting Allen at every turn.
Kate was ready to bring the play to a conclusion and expressed concern over


just how she was going to do that.
“I donít really know what happens at the end,” she said. “I havenít figured that out yet.”
What happens at the end. Itís a colloquial way of saying it, but itís as good a way as any to describe what we mean by the event of a play.
The final basic tool at your disposal, after action and conflict, is the event. It is related to action and conflict in the sense that it provides their culmination or “climax” — the moment to which the action and conflict have been leading.
PrevRead a few excerpts

And what they say about it....

The Playwright's Guidebook is indispensable. Clearly and thoroughly, Mr. Spencer—a playwright himself—leads all playwrights (not only the beginner) through the travails of creation and the jungle of production.”


“If you want to be a playwright, here's your bible.”


“Eureka! A clearly written, well-structured, intelligent how-to book about playwriting. Like the good teacher and good writer that he is, Stuart Spencer guides rather than browbeats. Should be next to the laptop of any aspiring, or working playwright.”


“Mr. Spencer's Guidebook is full of solid, straightforward advice in a conversational voice that takes the mystery out of how plays are wrought, not written.”


Buy the Playwright's Guidebook at or The Drama Book Shop